BLACK+DECKER BL1400DG-P vs Vitamix A3500 with Stainless Steel Container
The short answer
Vitamix A3500 with Stainless Steel Container comes out ahead overall with 7.8/10 against 7.3/10 for the BLACK+DECKER BL1400DG-P. BLACK+DECKER BL1400DG-P is stronger on value. Vitamix A3500 with Stainless Steel Container is stronger on blending performance, health & materials, build & durability, ease of use & cleaning and capacity & versatility.
- Choose the BLACK+DECKER BL1400DG-P if: Budget shoppers who want a full-size glass jar for everyday smoothies for under $60.
- Choose the Vitamix A3500 with Stainless Steel Container if: Buyers who want high-performance blending, a 10-year warranty and a stainless jar instead of plastic, and can pay $750 direct from Vitamix.
Scores by criterion
| Criterion | BLACK+DECKER BL1400DG-P | Vitamix A3500 with Stainless Steel Container |
|---|---|---|
| Blending Performance | 7.6RTINGS' best cheap blender; makes smooth smoothies, though it isn't a heavy ice crusher. | 9.0Inferred from tests of the stainless container on full-size Vitamix bases; the bundle itself hasn't been lab-tested. |
| Health & Materials | 6.3Glass main jar; the personal jar is Tritan and the lid material isn't disclosed. | 8.5Uncoated stainless jar and blades with ink-free markings; the lid is Tritan and the tamper is plastic. |
| Build & Durability | 6.0RTINGS rates it sturdier than the Hamilton Beach Wave Crusher; 2-year warranty. | 9.610-year full warranty (Vitamix page); metal drive; containers sold separately. |
| Ease of Use & Cleaning | 7.03 speeds, 3 auto functions and pulse; removable parts dishwasher safe per the brand. | 7.5Programs, touchscreen and self-clean; the jar is opaque and heavier than plastic. |
| Capacity & Versatility | 7.048 oz glass jar plus an optional 24 oz personal jar. | 7.548 oz jar; the base accepts other Vitamix self-detect containers. |
| Value | 9.0$58.99 sold by Amazon for RTINGS' budget pick. | 4.5$749.95 list from Vitamix; no current sale verified. |
Specifications
| Spec | BLACK+DECKER BL1400DG-P | Vitamix A3500 with Stainless Steel Container |
|---|---|---|
| Main Jar Material | Glass (Cyclone) | Stainless steel |
| Main Jar Capacity | 48 oz | 48 oz |
| Lid Material | — | BPA-free Tritan plastic |
| Blade / Blade Assembly Material | Stainless steel (serrated) | Stainless steel |
| Nonstick Coating in Jar | No | No |
| Plastic Personal Cup Included | Yes | No |
| Motor Power | 900 W | — |
| Speeds / Programs | 3 speeds + 3 auto functions + pulse | Variable speed + programs (Ascent series) |
| Built-in Heating | No | No |
| Dishwasher-Safe Jar | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty | 2 years | 10 years |
BLACK+DECKER BL1400DG-P
Pros
- Full-size 48 oz glass jar
- Smooth blends in RTINGS testing
- Budget price
- 900 W motor with serrated stainless blades
- Removable parts dishwasher safe per the maker
Cons
- Personal jar is Tritan plastic
- Lid material not disclosed
- Only a 2-year warranty
- Glass jar is heavier and breakable
The best way to get a real glass-jar blender without spending much, as long as you accept an undisclosed lid and shorter warranty.
Full BLACK+DECKER BL1400DG-P review →Vitamix A3500 with Stainless Steel Container
Pros
- Stainless jar with stainless blades
- 10-year full warranty including shipping
- Jar blends on par with Vitamix plastic jars
- Better seal than the plastic 48 oz in a vacuum test
- Accepts other Vitamix self-detect containers
Cons
- Very expensive at full price
- Lid and tamper are plastic
- Opaque jar, so you can't watch the blend
- Bundle itself not independently tested
The best option for shoppers who want top-tier performance and durability without a plastic jar, provided they accept the premium cost and a plastic lid.
Full Vitamix A3500 with Stainless Steel Container review →Both products are part of our guide The Best Glass & Stainless Jar (Plastic-Free) Blenders of 2026, where you can see every pick, how we score and current prices from each retailer.