Blenders · Head-to-head
Tribest PBG-5050-A vs Vitamix A3500 with Stainless Steel Container
The short answer
Vitamix A3500 with Stainless Steel Container comes out ahead overall with 7.8/10 against 6.2/10 for the Tribest PBG-5050-A. Tribest PBG-5050-A is stronger on value. Vitamix A3500 with Stainless Steel Container is stronger on blending performance, build & durability and capacity & versatility.
- Choose the Tribest PBG-5050-A if: Single-serve smoothie and dressing makers who prioritize glass and stainless contact over power.
- Choose the Vitamix A3500 with Stainless Steel Container if: Buyers who want high-performance blending, a 10-year warranty and a stainless jar instead of plastic, and can pay $750 direct from Vitamix.
Scores by criterion
| Criterion | Tribest PBG-5050-A | Vitamix A3500 with Stainless Steel Container |
|---|---|---|
| Blending Performance | 5.0250 W; fine for soft blends, weak on ice; no lab tests. | 9.0Inferred from tests of the stainless container on full-size Vitamix bases; the bundle itself hasn't been lab-tested. |
| Health & Materials | 8.5Glass, stainless and silicone food path per the manufacturer; not independently verified. | 8.5Uncoated stainless jar and blades with ink-free markings; the lid is Tritan and the tamper is plastic. |
| Build & Durability | 7.55-year warranty; parts sold direct. | 9.610-year full warranty (Vitamix page); metal drive; containers sold separately. |
| Ease of Use & Cleaning | 7.5Blend-in-cup design; dishwasher guidance unconfirmed. | 7.5Programs, touchscreen and self-clean; the jar is opaque and heavier than plastic. |
| Capacity & Versatility | 5.0Single-serve glass cups only. | 7.548 oz jar; the base accepts other Vitamix self-detect containers. |
| Value | 5.0$188 from a third-party seller is high for 250 W. | 4.5$749.95 list from Vitamix; no current sale verified. |
Specifications
| Spec | Tribest PBG-5050-A | Vitamix A3500 with Stainless Steel Container |
|---|---|---|
| Main Jar Material | Tempered glass | Stainless steel |
| Main Jar Capacity | 24 oz | 48 oz |
| Lid Material | Silicone-lined lids | BPA-free Tritan plastic |
| Blade / Blade Assembly Material | All-stainless steel blade assembly | Stainless steel |
| Nonstick Coating in Jar | No | No |
| Plastic Personal Cup Included | No | No |
| Motor Power | 250 W | — |
| Speeds / Programs | — | Variable speed + programs (Ascent series) |
| Built-in Heating | No | No |
| Dishwasher-Safe Jar | — | Yes |
| Warranty | 5 years | 10 years |
Tribest PBG-5050-A
Pros
- Glass cups in three sizes
- All-stainless blade assembly
- Silicone-lined lids
- 5-year warranty
- Parts sold directly by Tribest
Cons
- Low 250 W power
- Not suited to ice or thick blends
- No independent testing
- Expensive for its power
A good fit for light single-serve use when keeping food away from plastic outranks power.
Full Tribest PBG-5050-A review →Vitamix A3500 with Stainless Steel Container
Pros
- Stainless jar with stainless blades
- 10-year full warranty including shipping
- Jar blends on par with Vitamix plastic jars
- Better seal than the plastic 48 oz in a vacuum test
- Accepts other Vitamix self-detect containers
Cons
- Very expensive at full price
- Lid and tamper are plastic
- Opaque jar, so you can't watch the blend
- Bundle itself not independently tested
The best option for shoppers who want top-tier performance and durability without a plastic jar, provided they accept the premium cost and a plastic lid.
Full Vitamix A3500 with Stainless Steel Container review →Both products are part of our guide The Best Glass & Stainless Jar (Plastic-Free) Blenders of 2026, where you can see every pick, how we score and current prices from each retailer.