AquaTru Carafe (AT100) vs Bluevua RO100ROPOT-UV
Bluevua RO100ROPOT-UV
The short answer
AquaTru Carafe (AT100) comes out ahead overall with 8.3/10 against 6.2/10 for the Bluevua RO100ROPOT-UV. AquaTru Carafe (AT100) is stronger on pfas reduction evidence, other contaminant coverage, value, installation & cabinet fit, health, materials & sustainability and reliability & support. Bluevua RO100ROPOT-UV is stronger on flow & daily convenience. At current verified prices, the AquaTru Carafe (AT100) costs about $71.50 less.
- Choose the AquaTru Carafe (AT100) if: Most households that want certified PFAS reduction, purified water stored only in glass, and the lowest price among certified units, with no plumbing.
- Choose the Bluevua RO100ROPOT-UV if: Buyers who want a borosilicate glass carafe, UV and added minerals, and accept PFAS proof below certification.
Scores by criterion
| Criterion | AquaTru Carafe (AT100) | Bluevua RO100ROPOT-UV |
|---|---|---|
| PFAS reduction evidence | 9.5Its data sheet names the exact models (AT100–AT140) under IAPMO's NSF/ANSI 53 PFOA/PFOS certification, with about 99% average reduction. | 5.5Maker SGS reports plus TechGearLab's qualitative PFAS removal; no certification. |
| Other contaminant coverage | 8.8Certified to 42/53/58/401, plus an independent Tap Score panel showing 100% removal of 8 of 10 detected contaminants. | 7.0WQA for TDS/chromium III; TechGearLab found 100% lead and fluoride removal, while WaterFilterGuru measured 83% fluoride reduction. |
| Value | 8.2Cheapest certified unit at $337.50; its 600-gal filters cost about $0.29 per gallon. | 5.5$409 plus about $150 a year with no PFAS certification. |
| Installation & cabinet fit | 8.5Compact and plug-in; the carafe fits in a fridge door. | 8.0Plug-in and compact. |
| Flow & daily convenience | 5.58 cups take about 16.5 minutes, so expect 3–4 refill/empty cycles a day. | 6.02 L batch; some testers noticed a slight plastic taste. |
| Health, materials & sustainability | 8.0Stored water touches only glass; Tritan BPA/BPS-free housing; NSF 372. | 7.0Borosilicate glass and NSF 372, but the highest wastewater in BOS's top seven. |
| Reliability & support | 6.0BOS Water reports owner complaints about leaks and support. | 5.5Owner complaints of malfunctions (BOS Water). |
Specifications
| Spec | AquaTru Carafe (AT100) | Bluevua RO100ROPOT-UV |
|---|---|---|
| Filter type | Reverse osmosis (pre/carbon, RO membrane, VOC carbon) | Reverse osmosis + UV + remineralization (PP, carbon block, RO, post-carbon, mineral) |
| PFAS certification (as stated by maker) | IAPMO R&T certified to NSF/ANSI 53 for PFOA/PFOS (models AT100–AT140); also NSF/ANSI 42, 58, 372, 401 | SGS-tested PFOA/PFOS reduction (maker-commissioned); WQA Gold Seal for TDS and chromium III only |
| Third-party certified for PFAS | Yes | No |
| Filtration stages | 4 | 6 |
| Filter capacity (primary cartridge) | 600 gal | 1,076 gal |
| Rated filter life | 24 months | 24 months |
| Rated flow rate | 0.03 gpm | 0.06 gpm |
| Est. annual filter cost | 111 USD | 150 USD |
| Pure-to-drain ratio (RO) | 4:1 claimed; BOS Water measured ~1.8:1 | 2:1 |
| Needs electrical outlet | Yes | Yes |
| Uses dedicated faucet (drilling may be needed) | No | No |
| Water capacity | 8 cups | 7.5 cups |
| Pitcher body material | Glass carafe; Tritan (BPA/BPS-free) housing | Borosilicate glass carafe |
| Dispenses hot water | No | No |
| Remineralization stage included | No | Yes |
| UV sterilization | No | Yes |
AquaTru Carafe (AT100)
Pros
- Certified to NSF/ANSI 42, 53, 58, 372 and 401, including PFOA/PFOS
- Purified water touches only glass
- WaterFilterGuru's top-scoring countertop RO
- Lowest price among certified units
- Optional mineral filter adds minerals back
Cons
- Small capacity means several refill cycles a day
- Filters rated for 600 gallons, so cost per gallon is higher than the Classic
- Owners report some failures, leaks and weak support
The best-documented countertop RO we found. It has certification that names its models, strong independent test results and a glass carafe. Daily convenience is its weak spot.
Full AquaTru Carafe (AT100) review →Bluevua RO100ROPOT-UV
Pros
- Borosilicate glass carafe
- UV and remineralization stages
- Strong reviewer recommendations
- 24-month RO membrane
Cons
- PFAS reduction not certified
- Filters cost about $150 a year
- Highest wastewater of BOS Water's top seven
- Small batch size and some owner complaints about reliability
A feature-rich option for buyers who want better-tasting, mineralized water and accept PFAS proof below certification. It costs more to run than the AquaTru units.
Full Bluevua RO100ROPOT-UV review →Both products are part of our guide The Best Countertop Reverse Osmosis (No Install) of 2026, where you can see every pick, how we score and current prices from each retailer.