Midea MET26C4AST vs Panasonic NB-G211P
The short answer
Panasonic NB-G211P comes out ahead overall with 7.7/10 against 7.3/10 for the Midea MET26C4AST. Midea MET26C4AST is stronger on value and capacity & versatility. Panasonic NB-G211P is stronger on cooking performance, ptfe/pfas-free evidence, health & materials and reliability & support. At current verified prices, the Midea MET26C4AST costs about $45.43 less.
- Choose the Midea MET26C4AST if: Households that want a large French-door air-fry oven with a PFAS-free enamel interior for about $200.
- Choose the Panasonic NB-G211P if: Families who want air frying and a 1-cu-ft cavity with a manufacturer-stated PFAS-free enamel interior.
Scores by criterion
| Criterion | Midea MET26C4AST | Panasonic NB-G211P |
|---|---|---|
| Cooking performance | 6.51750W with convection; no independent test. | 7.0Infrared plus convection with 11 settings; no major independent test; 445°F max. |
| PTFE/PFAS-free evidence | 7.3Explicit manufacturer claim for the cavity and tray; accessory materials unstated. | 8.8Explicit manufacturer 'PFAS-free interior' statement; the CA disclosure only supports it. |
| Health & materials | 7.3Enamel cavity and tray are inert; basket and rack materials unknown. | 8.3Inert porcelain enamel and a mesh basket; enamel can chip if knocked. |
| Value | 8.0$204 sold by Amazon for the largest PFAS-free-claimed cavity. | 6.5$249.87 from a third-party seller on Amazon ($299.99 at Best Buy) is fairly high without test data. |
| Ease of use & cleaning | 7.5French doors, enamel wipe-down, digital controls. | 7.8Enamel wipes clean; simple dials. |
| Capacity & versatility | 9.026.4 qt, 6 slices, 10 functions. | 8.528 L, air fry, convection, 11 functions. |
| Reliability & support | 6.0Model listed since Nov 2025; little long-term data. | 7.0New model; Panasonic support; not covered by the recall. |
Specifications
| Spec | Midea MET26C4AST | Panasonic NB-G211P |
|---|---|---|
| Cavity / interior material | Porcelain enamel | Porcelain enamel |
| Food-contact coatings (pans/baskets) | Enamel baking tray; rack and basket materials unstated | Enamel tray; mesh air-fry basket |
| PFAS/PTFE-free documented by manufacturer | Yes | Yes |
| PFAS evidence source | Midea product page | Panasonic press release + chemical disclosure |
| Interior capacity | 25 L | 28 L |
| Toast capacity | 6 slices | — |
| Power | 1,750 W | 1,800 W |
| Max temperature | 450 °F | 445 °F |
| Air fry mode | Yes | Yes |
| Convection fan | Yes | Yes |
| Controls | Digital, 10 functions | Dial controls, 11 cook settings |
Midea MET26C4AST
Pros
- Large 26.4 qt cavity
- PFAS-free enamel interior per Midea
- Enamel baking tray included
- Lower price than other full-size options here
- French-door design
Cons
- No major independent test; its Best Value standing is unverified by independent testing
- Rack, basket and crumb tray materials not stated
- Newer model with limited long-term owner data
- Listings conflict on temperature range
A strong value for a big enamel oven, with the caveat that it has the thinnest track record here. Buy it for the space and price, not for proven performance.
Full Midea MET26C4AST review →Panasonic NB-G211P
Pros
- Explicit manufacturer statement of a PFAS-free enamel interior
- 28 L cavity suits family-size meals
- Infrared plus convection heating, with air fry
- 11 cooking functions
- Enamel tray and mesh basket, no ceramic coating
Cons
- Little independent test coverage
- Mid-to-premium price; Best Buy lists it higher than the Amazon third-party offer
- Amazon listings disagree on the temperature range
- Panasonic's site shows a recall banner, but the recall covers a different model (NB-G200SVA)
The best fit for this guide: a clear PFAS-free statement, an enamel cavity and plenty of room. Cooking results are less documented than its credentials, but it is the pick we would buy first.
Full Panasonic NB-G211P review →Both products are part of our guide The Best Non-Toxic Toaster Ovens (No PTFE) of 2026, where you can see every pick, how we score and current prices from each retailer.